Emergent Shared Intentions Support Coordination During Collective Musical Improvisations.
Identifieur interne : 000053 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000052; suivant : 000054Emergent Shared Intentions Support Coordination During Collective Musical Improvisations.
Auteurs : Louise Goupil ; Thomas Wolf ; Pierre Saint-Germier ; Jean-Julien Aucouturier ; Clément CanonneSource :
- Cognitive science [ 1551-6709 ] ; 2021.
Abstract
Human interactions are often improvised rather than scripted, which suggests that efficient coordination can emerge even when collective plans are largely underspecified. One possibility is that such forms of coordination primarily rely on mutual influences between interactive partners, and on perception-action couplings such as entrainment or mimicry. Yet some forms of improvised joint actions appear difficult to explain solely by appealing to these emergent mechanisms. Here, we focus on collective free improvisation, a form of highly unplanned creative practice where both agents' subjective reports and the complexity of their interactions suggest that shared intentions may sometimes emerge to support coordination during the course of the improvisation, even in the absence of verbal communication. In four experiments, we show that shared intentions spontaneously emerge during collective musical improvisations, and that they foster coordination on multiple levels, over and beyond the mere influence of shared information. We also show that musicians deploy communicative strategies to manifest and propagate their intentions within the group, and that this predicts better coordination. Overall, our results suggest that improvised and scripted joint actions are more continuous with one another than it first seems, and that they differ merely in the extent to which they rely on emergent or planned coordination mechanisms.
DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12932
PubMed: 33438231
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Emergent Shared Intentions Support Coordination During Collective Musical Improvisations.</title><author><name sortKey="Goupil, Louise" sort="Goupil, Louise" uniqKey="Goupil L" first="Louise" last="Goupil">Louise Goupil</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Science and Technology of Music and Sound (UMR 9912, IRCAM/CNRS/Sorbonne University).</nlm:affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField">IRCAM/CNRS/Sorbonne University)</wicri:noCountry></affiliation><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>School of Psychology, University of East London.</nlm:affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField">University of East London</wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Wolf, Thomas" sort="Wolf, Thomas" uniqKey="Wolf T" first="Thomas" last="Wolf">Thomas Wolf</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Cognitive Science, Central European University.</nlm:affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField">Central European University</wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Saint Germier, Pierre" sort="Saint Germier, Pierre" uniqKey="Saint Germier P" first="Pierre" last="Saint-Germier">Pierre Saint-Germier</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Science and Technology of Music and Sound (UMR 9912, IRCAM/CNRS/Sorbonne University).</nlm:affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField">IRCAM/CNRS/Sorbonne University)</wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Aucouturier, Jean Julien" sort="Aucouturier, Jean Julien" uniqKey="Aucouturier J" first="Jean-Julien" last="Aucouturier">Jean-Julien Aucouturier</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Science and Technology of Music and Sound (UMR 9912, IRCAM/CNRS/Sorbonne University).</nlm:affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField">IRCAM/CNRS/Sorbonne University)</wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Canonne, Clement" sort="Canonne, Clement" uniqKey="Canonne C" first="Clément" last="Canonne">Clément Canonne</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Science and Technology of Music and Sound (UMR 9912, IRCAM/CNRS/Sorbonne University).</nlm:affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField">IRCAM/CNRS/Sorbonne University)</wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2021">2021</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:33438231</idno><idno type="pmid">33438231</idno><idno type="doi">10.1111/cogs.12932</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">000055</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000055</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000055</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Curation">000055</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000055</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Emergent Shared Intentions Support Coordination During Collective Musical Improvisations.</title><author><name sortKey="Goupil, Louise" sort="Goupil, Louise" uniqKey="Goupil L" first="Louise" last="Goupil">Louise Goupil</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Science and Technology of Music and Sound (UMR 9912, IRCAM/CNRS/Sorbonne University).</nlm:affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField">IRCAM/CNRS/Sorbonne University)</wicri:noCountry></affiliation><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>School of Psychology, University of East London.</nlm:affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField">University of East London</wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Wolf, Thomas" sort="Wolf, Thomas" uniqKey="Wolf T" first="Thomas" last="Wolf">Thomas Wolf</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Cognitive Science, Central European University.</nlm:affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField">Central European University</wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Saint Germier, Pierre" sort="Saint Germier, Pierre" uniqKey="Saint Germier P" first="Pierre" last="Saint-Germier">Pierre Saint-Germier</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Science and Technology of Music and Sound (UMR 9912, IRCAM/CNRS/Sorbonne University).</nlm:affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField">IRCAM/CNRS/Sorbonne University)</wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Aucouturier, Jean Julien" sort="Aucouturier, Jean Julien" uniqKey="Aucouturier J" first="Jean-Julien" last="Aucouturier">Jean-Julien Aucouturier</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Science and Technology of Music and Sound (UMR 9912, IRCAM/CNRS/Sorbonne University).</nlm:affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField">IRCAM/CNRS/Sorbonne University)</wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Canonne, Clement" sort="Canonne, Clement" uniqKey="Canonne C" first="Clément" last="Canonne">Clément Canonne</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Science and Technology of Music and Sound (UMR 9912, IRCAM/CNRS/Sorbonne University).</nlm:affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField">IRCAM/CNRS/Sorbonne University)</wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Cognitive science</title><idno type="eISSN">1551-6709</idno><imprint><date when="2021" type="published">2021</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Human interactions are often improvised rather than scripted, which suggests that efficient coordination can emerge even when collective plans are largely underspecified. One possibility is that such forms of coordination primarily rely on mutual influences between interactive partners, and on perception-action couplings such as entrainment or mimicry. Yet some forms of improvised joint actions appear difficult to explain solely by appealing to these emergent mechanisms. Here, we focus on collective free improvisation, a form of highly unplanned creative practice where both agents' subjective reports and the complexity of their interactions suggest that shared intentions may sometimes emerge to support coordination during the course of the improvisation, even in the absence of verbal communication. In four experiments, we show that shared intentions spontaneously emerge during collective musical improvisations, and that they foster coordination on multiple levels, over and beyond the mere influence of shared information. We also show that musicians deploy communicative strategies to manifest and propagate their intentions within the group, and that this predicts better coordination. Overall, our results suggest that improvised and scripted joint actions are more continuous with one another than it first seems, and that they differ merely in the extent to which they rely on emergent or planned coordination mechanisms.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="In-Data-Review" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">33438231</PMID><DateRevised><Year>2021</Year><Month>01</Month><Day>13</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1551-6709</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>45</Volume><Issue>1</Issue><PubDate><Year>2021</Year><Month>Jan</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Cognitive science</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Cogn Sci</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Emergent Shared Intentions Support Coordination During Collective Musical Improvisations.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>e12932</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1111/cogs.12932</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>Human interactions are often improvised rather than scripted, which suggests that efficient coordination can emerge even when collective plans are largely underspecified. One possibility is that such forms of coordination primarily rely on mutual influences between interactive partners, and on perception-action couplings such as entrainment or mimicry. Yet some forms of improvised joint actions appear difficult to explain solely by appealing to these emergent mechanisms. Here, we focus on collective free improvisation, a form of highly unplanned creative practice where both agents' subjective reports and the complexity of their interactions suggest that shared intentions may sometimes emerge to support coordination during the course of the improvisation, even in the absence of verbal communication. In four experiments, we show that shared intentions spontaneously emerge during collective musical improvisations, and that they foster coordination on multiple levels, over and beyond the mere influence of shared information. We also show that musicians deploy communicative strategies to manifest and propagate their intentions within the group, and that this predicts better coordination. Overall, our results suggest that improvised and scripted joint actions are more continuous with one another than it first seems, and that they differ merely in the extent to which they rely on emergent or planned coordination mechanisms.</AbstractText><CopyrightInformation>© 2021 Cognitive Science Society, Inc.</CopyrightInformation></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Goupil</LastName><ForeName>Louise</ForeName><Initials>L</Initials><Identifier Source="ORCID">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4342-9408</Identifier><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Science and Technology of Music and Sound (UMR 9912, IRCAM/CNRS/Sorbonne University).</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>School of Psychology, University of East London.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Wolf</LastName><ForeName>Thomas</ForeName><Initials>T</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Cognitive Science, Central European University.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Saint-Germier</LastName><ForeName>Pierre</ForeName><Initials>P</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Science and Technology of Music and Sound (UMR 9912, IRCAM/CNRS/Sorbonne University).</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Aucouturier</LastName><ForeName>Jean-Julien</ForeName><Initials>JJ</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Science and Technology of Music and Sound (UMR 9912, IRCAM/CNRS/Sorbonne University).</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Canonne</LastName><ForeName>Clément</ForeName><Initials>C</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Science and Technology of Music and Sound (UMR 9912, IRCAM/CNRS/Sorbonne University).</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><GrantList CompleteYN="Y"><Grant><GrantID>ANR-17-CE27-0021</GrantID><Agency>ANR MICA</Agency><Country></Country></Grant><Grant><GrantID>CREAM 335536</GrantID><Agency>ERC</Agency><Country></Country></Grant><Grant><GrantID>SOMICS 609819</GrantID><Agency>ERC</Agency><Country></Country></Grant><Grant><GrantID>JAXPERTISE 616072</GrantID><Agency>ERC</Agency><Country></Country></Grant><Grant><GrantID>JDIL-845859</GrantID><Agency>H2020-MSCA-IF-2018</Agency><Country></Country></Grant><Grant><Agency>Central European University Foundation</Agency><Country></Country></Grant></GrantList><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>Cogn Sci</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>7708195</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0364-0213</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM"><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Coordination</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Goal representations</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Improvisation</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Joint action</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Musical performance</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Shared intentions</Keyword></KeywordList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2020</Year><Month>05</Month><Day>15</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="revised"><Year>2020</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>26</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2020</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>09</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2021</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>13</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>16</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2021</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>14</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2021</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>14</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">33438231</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1111/cogs.12932</ArticleId></ArticleIdList><ReferenceList><Title>References</Title><Reference><Citation>Aglioti, S. M., Cesari, P., Romani, M., & Urgesi, C. (2008). Action anticipation and motor resonance in elite basketball players. Nature Neuroscience, 11, 1109-1116. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2182</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Arthurs, T. (2016). Secret gardeners: An ethnography of improvised music in Berlin (2012-13). Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Aucouturier, J. J., & Canonne, C. (2017). Musical friends and foes: The social cognition of affiliation and control in improvised interactions. Cognition, 161, 94-108.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Bailey, D. (1992). Improvisation: Its nature and practice in music. New York: Da Capo Press.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Beaver, D. I., Roberts, C., Simons, M., & Tonhauser, J. (2017). Questions under discussion: Where information structure meets projective content. Annual Review of Linguistics, 3, 265-284. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011516-033952</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Bishop, L., & Goebl, W. (2014). Context-specific effects of musical expertise on audiovisual integration. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1123. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01123</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Boersma, P. (1993). Accurate short-term analysis of the fundamental frequency and the harmonics-to-noise ratio of a sampled sound. Proceedings of the Institute of Phonetic Sciences, 17, 97-110.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Boersma, P. (2001). Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International, 5(9/10), 341-345.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Borgo, D. (2005). Sync or swarm: Improvising music in a complex age. London: A&C Black.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Bourbousson, J., Poizat, G., Saury, J., & Seve, C. (2010). Team coordination in basketball: Description of the cognitive connections among teammates. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 22, 150-166. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413201003664657</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Bratman, M. E. (1999). Shared intention. In E. Sosa (Ed.), Faces of intention: Selected essays on intention and agency (pp. 109-129). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Bratman, M. E. (2014). Shared agency: A planning theory of acting together. Oxford: Oxford University Press.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Butterfill, S. A. (2013). Interacting mindreaders. Philosophical Studies, 165(3), 841-863. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-012-9980-x</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Butterfill, S. A. (2018). Coordinating joint action. In M. Jankovic & K. Ludwig (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of collective intentionality (pp. 68-82). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315768571-8</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Butterfill, S. A., & Apperly, I. A. (2013). How to construct a minimal theory of mind. Mind and Language, 28(5), 606-637. https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12036</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Canonne, C. (2013). Focal points in collective free improvisation. Perspectives of New Music, 51, e40. https://doi.org/10.7757/persnewmusi.51.1.0040</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Canonne, C. (2018). Rehearsing free improvisation? An ethnographic study of free improvisers at work. Music Theory Online, 24(4). https://doi.org/10.30535/mto.24.4.1</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Canonne, C., & Garnier, N. (2012). Cognition and segmentation in collective free improvisation: An exploratory study. In E. Cambouropoulos, C. Tsougras, P. Mavromatis, & K. Pastiadis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th international conference on music perception and cognition and 8th triennial conference of the European Society for the Cognitive Sciences of Music (pp. 197-204). Thessaloniki: Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Carré, A., Stefaniak, N., D'Ambrosio, F., Bensalah, L., & Besche-Richard, C. (2013). The basic empathy scale in adults (BES-A): Factor structure of a revised form. Psychological Assessment, 25(3), 679-691.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Corps, R. E., Gambi, C., & Pickering, M. J. (2018). Coordinating utterances during turn-taking: The role of prediction, response preparation, and articulation. Discourse Processes, 55(2), 230-240. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2017.1330031.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>D'Ausilio, A., Novembre, G., Fadiga, L., & Keller, P. E. (2015). What can music tell us about social interaction? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(3), 111-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.01.005</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>D'Ausilio, A., Badino, L., Li, Y., Tokay, S., Craighero, L., Canto, R., Aloimonos, Y., & Fadiga, L. (2012). Leadership in orchestra emerges from the causal relationships of movement kinematics. PLoS One, 7(5), e35757. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035757</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>De Freitas, J., Thomas, K., DeScioli, P., & Pinker, S. (2019). Common knowledge, coordination, and strategic mentalizing in human social life. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(28), 13751-13758. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1905518116</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>De Spain, K. (2014). Landscape of the now: A topography of movement improvisation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>della Gatta, F., Garbarini, F., Rabuffetti, M., Viganò, L., Butterfill, S. A., & Sinigaglia, C. (2017). Drawn together: When motor representations ground joint actions. Cognition, 165, 53-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COGNITION.2017.04.008</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Denzler, B., & Guionnet, J.-L. (2020). The practice of musical improvisation: Dialogues with contemporary musical improvisers. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2007). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Policy analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics (Vol. 4054). New York: Wiley.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Gueguen, N., Jacob, C., & Martin, A. (2009). Mimicry in social interaction: Its effect on human judgment and behavior. European Journal of Social Sciences, 8(2), 253-259.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Hadley, L. V., Sturt, P., Moran, N., & Pickering, M. J. (2018). Determining the end of a musical turn: Effects of tonal cues. Acta Psychologica, 182, 89-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.11.001</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Heggli, O. A., Konvalinka, I., Kringelbach, M. L., & Vuust, P. (2019). Musical interaction is influenced by underlying predictive models and musical expertise. Scientific Reports, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47471-3</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Helm, J. L., Miller, J. G., Kahle, S., Troxel, N. R., & Hastings, P. D. (2018). On measuring and modeling physiological synchrony in dyads. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 53(4), 521-543. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2018.1459292</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Ingold, T., & Hallam, E. (2007). Creativity and cultural improvisation: An introduction. In E. Hallam & T. Ingold (Eds.), Creativity and cultural improvisation (pp. 1-24). New York: Berg. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537781415000316</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Issartel, J., Marin, L., & Cadopi, M. (2007). Unintended interpersonal co-ordination: “Can we march to the beat of our own drum?” Neuroscience Letters, 411(3), 174-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NEULET.2006.09.086</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Keller, P. E. (2008). Joint action in music performance. In F. Morganti, A. Carassa, & G. Riva (Eds.), Emerging communication: Studies on new technologies and practices in communication: Vol. 10. Enacting intersubjectivity: A cognitive and social perspective on the study of interactions (pp. 205-211). Amsterdam: IOS Press.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Keller, P. E. (2014). Ensemble performance: Interpersonal alignment of musical expression. In D. Fabian, R. Timmers, & E. Schubert (Eds.), Expressiveness in music performance: Empirical approaches across styles and cultures (pp. 260-282). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199659647.001.0001</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Kirschner, S., & Tomasello, M. (2010). Joint music making promotes prosocial behavior in 4-year-old children. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(5), 354-364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.04.004</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Knoblich, G., Butterfill, S., & Sebanz, N. (2011). Psychological research on joint action: Theory and data. Psychology of Learning and Motivation-Advances in Research and Theory, 54, 59-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-385527-5.00003-6</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Kourtis, D., Woźniak, M., Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2019). Evidence for we-representations during joint action planning. Neuropsychologia, 131, 73-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA.2019.05.029</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, H. B. (2014). lmerTest: Tests for random and fixed effects for linear mixed effect models (lmer objects of lme4 package). R package 2.0-11.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Linson, A., & Clarke, E. F. (2018). Distributed cognition, ecological theory, and group improvisation. In E. Clarke & M. Doffman (Eds.), Distributed creativity: Collaboration and improvisation in contemporary music (pp. 52-69). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Loehr, J. D., Kourtis, D., Vesper, C., Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2013). Monitoring individual and joint action outcomes in duet music performance. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(7), 1049-1061. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00388</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>MacDonald, R. A. R., & Wilson, G. B. (2020). The art of becoming: How group improvisation works. Oxford: Oxford University Press.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mendonça, D. J., & Wallace, W. A. (2007). A cognitive model of improvisation in emergency management. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part A: Systems and Humans, 37(4): 547-561. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCA.2007.897581</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Michael, J. (2011). Interactionism and mindreading. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 2(3), 559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-011-0066-z</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Michael, J. (2017). Music performance as joint action.pdf. In M. Lesaffre, P.-J. Maes, & M. Leman (Eds.), The Routledge companion to embodied music interaction (pp. 160-166). New York: Routledge.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Moran, N., Hadley, L. V., Bader, M., & Keller, P. E. (2015). Perception of “back-channeling” nonverbal feedback in musical duo improvisation. PLoS One, 10(6), e0130070. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130070</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Nessler, J. A., & Gilliland, S. J. (2009). Interpersonal synchronization during side by side treadmill walking is influenced by leg length differential and altered sensory feedback. Human Movement Science, 28(6), 772-785. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HUMOV.2009.04.007</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Nettl, B. (1974). Thoughts on improvisation: A comparative approach. The Musical Quarterly, 60(1), 1-19.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Novembre, G., Ticini, L. F., Schütz-Bosbach, S., & Keller, P. E. (2014). Motor simulation and the coordination of self and other in real-time joint action. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(8), 1062-1068. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nst086</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Noy, L., Dekel, E., & Alon, U. (2011). The mirror game as a paradigm for studying the dynamics of two people improvising motion together. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(52), 20947-20952. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1108155108</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Pachet, F., Roy, P., & Foulon, R. (2017). Do jazz improvisers really interact?. In M Lesaffre, P. J. Maes, & M. Leman (Eds.), The Routledge companion to embodied music interaction (pp. 167-176). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315621364-19</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Papiotis, P., Marchini, M., & Maestre, E. (2012). Computational analysis of solo versus ensemble performance in string quartets: Intonation and dynamics. Proceedings of the 12th international conference on music perception and cognition, Thessaloniki, Greece.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Pelz-Sherman, M. (1998). A framework for the analysis of performer interactions in western improvised contemporary art music. San Diego: University of California.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Pressing, J. (1984). Cognitive processes in improvisation. Advances in Psychology, 19, 345-363. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62358-4</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Preston, B. (2013). A philosophy of material culture: Action, function, and mind. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203069844</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Repp, B. H. (2005). Sensorimotor synchronization: A review of the tapping literature. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12(6), 969-992. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206433</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Sacheli, L. M., Arcangeli, E., & Paulesu, E. (2018). Evidence for a dyadic motor plan in joint action. Scientific Reports, 8, 5027. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-23275-9</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Savouret, A. (2010). Introduction à un solfège de l'audible. L'improvisation libre comme outil pratique. Symétrie.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Sawyer, R. K. (2003). Group creativity: Music. In Theater, collaboration. Mahwah: Erlbaum.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Schmidt, R. C., & Richardson, M. J. (2008). Dynamics of interpersonal coordination. In A. Fuchs, & V. K. Jirsa (Eds.), Coordination: Neural, behavioural and social dynamics (pp. 281-308). Berlin: Springer, Springer Nature. Coordination: Neural, behavioral and social dynamics. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74479-5_14</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Scott-Phillips, T. C., Kirby, S., & Ritchie, G. R. S. (2009). Signalling signalhood and the emergence of communication. Cognition, 113(2), 226-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.08.009</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Sethares, W. A. (1993). Local consonance and the relationship between timbre and scale. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 94, 1218. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.408175</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Steiner, S., Macquet, A.-C., & Seiler, R. (2017). An integrative perspective on interpersonal coordination in interactive team sports. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01440</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Van Baaren, R., Janssen, L., Chartrand, T. L., & Dijksterhuis, A. (2009). Where is the love? The social aspects of mimicry. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 364(1528), 2381-2389. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0057</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Vassilakis, P. N. (2001). Perceptual and physical properties of amplitude fluctuation and their musical significance. PhD thesis. University of California.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Vesper, C., Abramova, E., Bütepage, J., Ciardo, F., Crossey, B., Effenberg, A., Hristova, D., Karlinsky, A., McEllin, L., Nijssen, S. R. R., Schmitz, L., & Wahn, B. (2017). Joint action: Mental representations, shared information and general mechanisms for coordinating with others. Frontiers in Psychology, 07, 2039. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02039</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Vesper, C., Butterfill, S., Knoblich, G., & Sebanz, N. (2010). A minimal architecture for joint action. Neural Networks, 23(8-9), 998-1003. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NEUNET.2010.06.002</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Vesper, C., van der Wel, R. P. R. D., Knoblich, G., & Sebanz, N. (2011). Making oneself predictable: Reduced temporal variability facilitates joint action coordination. Experimental Brain Research, 211(3-4), 517-530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2706-z</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Vesper, C., van der Wel, R. P. R. D., Knoblich, G., & Sebanz, N. (2013). Are you ready to jump? Predictive mechanisms in interpersonal coordination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(1), 48-61. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028066</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Walsh, M., Roberts, I., & Besser, M. (2013). Upright citizens brigade comedy improvisation manual. Comedy Council of Nicea LLC.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Walton, A. E., Washburn, A., Langland-Hassan, P., Chemero, A., Kloos, H., & Richardson, M. J. (2018). Creating time: Social collaboration in music improvisation. Topics in Cognitive Science, 10(1), 95-119. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12306</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Wass, S. V., Whitehorn, M., Marriott Haresign, I., Phillips, E., & Leong, V. (2020). Interpersonal neural entrainment during early social interaction. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(4), 329-342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.01.006</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Yun, K., Watanabe, K., & Shimojo, S. (2012). Interpersonal body and neural synchronization as a marker of implicit social interaction. Scientific Reports, 2, 959. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00959</Citation></Reference></ReferenceList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Aucouturier, Jean Julien" sort="Aucouturier, Jean Julien" uniqKey="Aucouturier J" first="Jean-Julien" last="Aucouturier">Jean-Julien Aucouturier</name><name sortKey="Canonne, Clement" sort="Canonne, Clement" uniqKey="Canonne C" first="Clément" last="Canonne">Clément Canonne</name><name sortKey="Goupil, Louise" sort="Goupil, Louise" uniqKey="Goupil L" first="Louise" last="Goupil">Louise Goupil</name><name sortKey="Saint Germier, Pierre" sort="Saint Germier, Pierre" uniqKey="Saint Germier P" first="Pierre" last="Saint-Germier">Pierre Saint-Germier</name><name sortKey="Wolf, Thomas" sort="Wolf, Thomas" uniqKey="Wolf T" first="Thomas" last="Wolf">Thomas Wolf</name></noCountry></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Sante/explor/SanteMusiqueV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000053 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000053 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Sante
|area= SanteMusiqueV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:33438231
|texte= Emergent Shared Intentions Support Coordination During Collective Musical Improvisations.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:33438231" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a SanteMusiqueV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.38. |  |